Hi Ilyzium,
I just wanted to backup what you were saying about the generalized belief patterns that most of us are subjected to - not just by our circle of contacts, but in general through our upbringing; the media; cultural imprints etc etc.
Both Gabrielle & I are NLP Trained (she is a Master Practitioner and I am a Master Practitioner and NLP Trainer) and once you become aware of them, it is incredible just how many “limiting beliefs” are considered as fact by many.
It’s a great exercise to do, to ask oneself “how do I KNOW this to be true?” for any aspect of our lives (not just weight loss).
Which brings me to the whole calorie debate.
I’m actually the person who put the calculator up on our sister site - from public demand I might add - as it at least gives a comparison to other activities which seems to resonate for us.
Perhaps as a gross measurement of energy in/energy out, calorific intake has some value, but as has been stated elsewhere, too little intake *might* send the body into a kind of hibernation where energy is stored (as fat among other things).
In addition, let’s look at belief systems again: If someone believes that it is necessary to measure calories to lose weight, then they may well NEED to do that to be convinced.
It’s also been suggested that independent of calories comes the “basal metabolic rate” - and if this is higher then that person will burn calories faster than someone with a lower rate. A 1964 study of men who moved to high altitude for 82-113 days showed an increase of 10% in their basal metabolic rate (BMR) ... it is even shown that the resting metabolic rate (RMR - and responsible for most/60-75% of our daily energy expenditure) is not only influenced by prolonged exercise but also by the extremes of environmental ambient temperature - hello hot yoga (though this does make a good case for “cold yoga”, which for other reasons, we don’t recommend!
).
Anyway, I just wanted to point out that although the calorie calculator is useful and certainly good for the curiosity factor, I would not be using it as an absolute measure.
As Bikhead points out - it would depend on consistent practice of all the poses - and I can tell you from years of experience and observation, it is possible to practice many of the poses while not necessarily working *that hard*. For example, the more you can engage quads/abs/core/tighten arm muscles etc, the more energy is being expended; more muscle strength/definition built etc This will be affected by the student’s yoga breathing practice as well - ongoing muscle use needs a good supply of oxygen!
Anyway, don’t believe me, I get all my information from Wikipedia!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_energy
(Actually not entirely true - I have referenced an excellent book by Lawrence Armstrong, “Performing In Extreme Environments”. An excellent resource for anyone interested in how one’s body does respond to exercising in extreme environments - such as hot yoga for example.)
Cheers!
Robert
PS. Just in case anyone is confused, in general Bikram yoga and hot yoga instructors usually don’t practice the poses alongside their students, so one wouldn’t expect them to be burning the same calories/joules.